T-convexity, Weakly Immediate Types, and T-λ-Spherical Completions of o-minimal Structures

Abstract

It is well known that ordered exponential fields with a compatible non-trivial valuation cannot be spherically complete, but there are some that are ``complete enough''. This paper gives analogues of Kaplansky's theorem on maximally valued fields that hold for a suitable class of elementary extensions of some ordered exponential fields with a compatible valuation. More precisely it does so for models of any theory Tconvex given by the expansion of a fixed complete o-minimal theory of ordered fields T, by a predicate O for a non-trivial T-convex valuation ring. For λ an uncountable cardinal, say that a unary type p(x) over a model of Tconvex is λ-bounded weakly immediate if its cut is defined by an empty intersection of fewer than λ many nested valuation balls. Call an elementary extension λ-bounded wim-constructible if it is obtained as a transfinite composition of extensions each generated by one element whose type is λ-bounded weakly immediate. I show that λ-bounded wim-constructible extensions do not extend the residue-field sort and that any two wim-constructible extensions can be amalgamated in an extension which is again λ-bounded wim-constructible over both. A consequence of this is that given an uncountable cardinal λ, every model of Tconvex has a unique-up-to-isomorphism λ-spherically complete λ-bounded wim-constructible extension providing an analogue of Kaplansky's theorem. I call this extension the T-λ-spherical completion. Another consequence is that Tconvex is definably spherically complete. When T is power bounded wim-constructible extensions are just the immediate extensions. I discuss the example of power bounded theories expanded by (simply exponential theories).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…