Beyond recognizing well-covered graphs
Abstract
We prove a number of results related to the computational complexity of recognizing well-covered graphs. Let k and s be positive integers and let G be a graph. Then G is said - Wk if for any k pairwise disjoint independent vertex sets A1, …, Ak in G, there exist k pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets S1, …,Sk in G such that Ai ⊂eq Si for i ∈ [k]. - Es if every independent set in G of size at most s is contained in a maximum independent set in G. Chv\'atal and Slater (1993) and Sankaranarayana and Stewart (1992) famously showed that recognizing W1 graphs or, equivalently, well-covered graphs is coNP-complete. We extend this result by showing that recognizing Wk+1 graphs in either Wk or Es graphs is coNP-complete. This answers a question of Levit and Tankus (2023) and strengthens a theorem of Feghali and Marin (2024). We also show that recognizing Es+1 graphs is 2p-complete even in Es graphs, where 2p = PNP[] is the class of problems solvable in polynomial time using a logarithmic number of calls to a SAT oracle. This strengthens a theorem of Berg\'e, Busson, Feghali and Watrigant (2023). We also obtain the complete picture of the complexity of recognizing chordal Wk and Es graphs which, in particular, simplifies and generalizes a result of Dettlaff, Henning and Topp (2023).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.