The quiescent population at 0.5 z 0.9: Environmental impact on the mass-size relation

Abstract

How the quiescent galaxies evolve with redshift and the factors that impact their evolution are still debated. It is still unclear what the dominant mechanisms of passive galaxy growth are and what role is played by the environment in shaping their evolutionary paths over cosmic time. Our aim is to study the mass-size relation (MSR) of the quiescent population and to understand how the environment shapes the MSR at intermediate redshift. We used the VIPERS, a large spectroscopic survey of 90~000 galaxies in the redshift range 0.5 z 1.2. We selected a mass-complete sample of 4786 passive galaxies based on the NUVrK diagram and refined it using the Dn4000 spectral index to study the MSR of the passive population over 0.5 z 0.9. The impact of the environment on the MSR and on the growth of the quiescent population is studied through the density contrast. The slope and the intercept of the MSR, α=0.62 0.04 and log(A)=0.52 0.01, agree well with values from the literature at the same redshift. The intercept decreases with redshift, Re(z)=8.20× (1+z)-1.70, while the slope remains roughly constant, and the same trend is observed in the low-density (LD) and high-density (HD) environments. We find that the average size of the quiescent population in the LD and HD environments are identical within 3σ and this result is robust against a change in the definition of the LD and HD environments or a change in the selection of quiescent galaxies. In the LD and HD environments, 30 and 40% of the population have experienced a minor merger process between 0.5 z 0.9. However, minor mergers account only for 30 to 40% of the size evolution in this redshift range, the remaining evolution likely being due to the progenitor bias.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…