Rings with common division, common meadows and their conditional equational theories

Abstract

We examine the consequences of having a total division operation xy on commutative rings. We consider two forms of binary division, one derived from a unary inverse, the other defined directly as a general operation; each are made total by setting 1/0 equal to an error value , which is added to the ring. Such totalised divisions we call common divisions. In a field the two forms are equivalent and we have a finite equational axiomatisation E that is complete for the equational theory of fields equipped with common division, called common meadows. These equational axioms E turn out to be true of commutative rings with common division but only when defined via inverses. We explore these axioms E and their role in seeking a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. We prove they are complete for the conditional equational theory of commutative rings with inverse based common division. By adding a new proof rule, we can prove a completeness theorem for the conditional equational theory of common meadows. Although, the equational axioms E fail with common division defined directly, we observe that the direct division does satisfies the equations in E under a new congruence for partial terms called eager equality.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…