Confusion concerning the extrapolated endpoint. When will it ever end?
Abstract
In a paper on ``the Brownian motion analog of the well-known Milne problem in radiative transfer theory'' [J Stat Phys 25 (1981) 569--82], Burschka and Titulaer reported: ``The value we find for this `Milne extrapolation length' is, in the appropriate dimensionless units, approximately twice the value found in the radiative transfer problem.'' A study by Ziff [J Stat Phys 65 (1991) 1217--33], concerned with the absorption of particles executing a Rayleigh flight (randomly directed displacements of equal length l) by a black sphere of radius R, led to a value for the extrapolation length γ about half as small as the benchmark result (for R l). The first discrepancy is shown to result from the disparity of the two length scales; the second, from the zero variance of the jump lengths. Ziff's finding that γ is independent of R for 0<l≤ 2R, cannot be reconciled with studies based on the Lorentz-Boltzmann equation and the Klein-Kramers equation.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.