A Bayesian mixture model approach to quantifying the empirical nuclear saturation point

Abstract

The equation of state (EOS) in the limit of infinite symmetric nuclear matter exhibits an equilibrium density, n0 ≈ 0.16 \, fm-3, at which the pressure vanishes and the energy per particle attains its minimum, E0 ≈ -16 \, MeV. Although not directly measurable, the saturation point (n0,E0) can be extrapolated by density functional theory (DFT), providing tight constraints for microscopic interactions derived from chiral effective field theory (EFT). However, when considering several DFT predictions for (n0,E0) from Skyrme and Relativistic Mean Field models together, a discrepancy between these model classes emerges at high confidence levels that each model prediction's uncertainty cannot explain. How can we leverage these DFT constraints to rigorously benchmark saturation properties of chiral interactions? To address this question, we present a Bayesian mixture model that combines multiple DFT predictions for (n0,E0) using an efficient conjugate prior approach. The inferred posterior for the saturation point's mean and covariance matrix follows a Normal-inverse-Wishart class, resulting in posterior predictives in the form of correlated, bivariate t-distributions. The DFT uncertainty reports are then used to mix these posteriors using an ordinary Monte Carlo approach. At the 95\% credibility level, we estimate n0 ≈ 0.157 0.010 \, fm-3 and E0 ≈ -15.97 0.40 \, MeV for the marginal (univariate) t-distributions. Combined with chiral EFT calculations of the pure neutron matter EOS, we obtain bivariate normal distributions for the symmetry energy and its slope parameter at n0: Sv ≈ 32.0 1.1 \, MeV and L≈ 52.6 8.1 \, MeV (95\%), respectively. Our Bayesian framework is publicly available, so practitioners can readily use and extend our results.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…