Is addition definable from multiplication and successor?
Abstract
A map f R S between (associative, unital, but not necessarily commutative) rings is abrachymorphism if f(1+x)=1+f(x) and f(xy)=f(x)f(y) whenever x,y∈ R. We tackle the problem whether every brachymorphism is additive (i.e., f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)), showing that in many contexts, including the following, the answer is positive: R is finite (or, more generally, R is left or right Artinian); R is any ring of 2×2 matrices over a commutative ring; R is Engelian; every element of R is a sum of π-regular and central elements (this applies to π-regular rings, Banach algebras, and power series rings); R is the full matrix ring of order greater than 1 over any ring; R is the monoid ring K[M] for a commutative ring K and a π-regular monoid M; R is the Weyl algebra A1(K) over a commutative ring K with positive characteristic; f is the power function x xn over any ring; f is the determinant function over any ring R of n× n matrices, with n≥3, over a commutative ring, such that if n>3 then R contains n scalar matrices with non zero divisor differences.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.