Reply to the "Comment on The Tully-Fisher law and dark matter effects derived via modified symmetries by I. Arraut"
Abstract
It has been claimed in 1, that the idea proposed in 2 has certain mistakes based on arguments of energy conditions and others. Additionally, some of the key arguments of the paper are criticized. Here we demonstrate that the results obtained in 2 are correct and that there is no violation of any energy condition. The statements claimed in 1 are based on three things: 1). Misinterpretation of the metric solution. 2). Language issues related to the physical quantities obtained in 1, where the authors make wrong interpretations about certain results over the geometry proposed in 2. 3). Non-rigorous evaluations of the vacuum condition defined via the result over the Ricci tensor Rμ=0
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.