Quasi-isotropic UV Emission in the ULX NGC~1313~X--1

Abstract

A major prediction of most super-Eddington accretion theories is the presence of anisotropic emission from supercritical disks, but the degree of anisotropy and its dependency with energy remain poorly constrained observationally. A key breakthrough allowing to test such predictions was the discovery of high-excitation photoionized nebulae around Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs). We present efforts to tackle the degree of anisotropy of the UV/EUV emission in super-Eddington accretion flows by studying the emission-line nebula around the archetypical ULX NGC~1313~X--1. We first take advantage of the extensive wealth of optical/near-UV and X-ray data from Hubble Space Telescope, XMM-Newton, Swift-XRT and NuSTAR observatories to perform multi-band, state-resolved spectroscopy of the source to constrain the spectral energy distribution (SED) along the line of sight. We then compare spatially-resolved Cloudy predictions using the observed line-of-sight SED with the nebular line ratios to assess whether the nebula `sees' the same SED as observed along the line of sight. We show that to reproduce the line ratios in the surrounding nebula, the photo-ionizing SED must be a factor ≈ 4 dimmer in ultraviolet emission than along the line-of-sight. Such nearly-iosotropic UV emission may be attributed to the quasi-spherical emission from the wind photosphere. We also discuss the apparent dichotomy in the observational properties of emission-line nebulae around soft and hard ULXs, and suggest only differences in mass-transfer rates can account for the EUV/X-ray spectral differences, as opposed to inclination effects. Finally, our multi-band spectroscopy suggest the optical/near-UV emission is not dominated by the companion star.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…