A New Conjecture and Upper Bound on the Castelnuovo--Mumford Regularity of Binomial Edge Ideals
Abstract
A famous theorem of Kalai and Meshulam is that reg(I + J) ≤ reg(I) + reg(J) -1 for any squarefree monomial ideals I and J. This result was subsequently extended by Herzog to the case where I and J are any monomial ideals. In this paper we conjecture that the Castelnuovo--Mumford regularity is subadditive on binomial edge ideals. Specifically, we propose that reg(JG) ≤ reg(JH1) + reg(JH2) -1 whenever G, H1, and H2 are graphs satisfying E(G) = E(H1) E(H2) and J is the associated binomial edge ideal. We prove a special case of this conjecture which strengthens the celebrated theorem of Malayeri--Madani--Kiani that reg(JG) is bounded above by the minimal number of maximal cliques covering the edges of the graph G. From this special case we obtain a new upper bound for reg(JG), namely that reg(JG) ≤ ht(JG) +1. Our upper bound gives an analogue of the well-known result that reg(I(G)) ≤ ht(I(G)) +1 where I(G) is the edge ideal of the graph G. We additionally prove that this conjecture holds for graphs admitting a combinatorial description for its Castelnuovo--Mumford regularity, that is for closed graphs, bipartite graphs with JG Cohen--Macaulay, and block graphs. Finally, we give examples to show that our new upper bound is incomparable with Malayeri--Madani--Kiani's upper bound for reg(JG) given by the size of a maximal clique disjoint set of edges.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.