ZTF SN~Ia DR2: Cosmology-independent constraints on Type Ia supernova standardisation from supernova siblings

Abstract

Understanding Type Ia supernovae (SNe~Ia) and the empirical standardisation relations that make them excellent distance indicators is vital to improving cosmological constraints. SN~Ia ``siblings", i.e. two or more SNe~Ia in the same host or parent galaxy offer a unique way to infer the standardisation relations and their diversity across the population. We analyse a sample of 25 SN~Ia pairs, observed homogeneously by the Zwicky Transient Factory (ZTF) to infer the SNe~Ia light curve width-luminosity and colour-luminosity parameters α and β. Using the pairwise constraints from siblings, allowing for a diversity in the standardisation relations, we find α = 0.218 0.055 and β = 3.084 0.312, respectively, with a dispersion in α and β of ≤ 0.195 and ≤ 0.923, respectively, at 95\% C.L. While the median dispersion is large, the values within 1 σ are consistent with no dispersion. Hence, fitting for a single global standardisation relation, we find α = 0.228 0.029 and β = 3.160 0.191. We find a very small intrinsic scatter of the siblings sample σ int ≤ 0.10 at 95\% C.L. compared to σ int = 0.22 0.04 when computing the scatter using the Hubble residuals without comparing them as siblings. Splitting the sample based on host galaxy stellar mass, we find that SNe~Ia in both subsamples have consistent α and β. The β value is consistent with the value for the cosmological sample. However, we find a higher α by 2.5 - 3.5 σ. The high α is driven by low x1 pairs, potentially suggesting that the slow and fast declining SN~Ia have different slopes of the width-luminosity relation. We can confirm or refute this with increased statistics from near future time-domain surveys. (abridged)

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…