Optimal Electrical Oblivious Routing on Expanders

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the question of whether the electrical flow routing is a good oblivious routing scheme on an m-edge graph G = (V, E) that is a -expander, i.e. where ∂ S ≥ · vol(S) for every S ⊂eq V, vol(S) ≤ vol(V)/2. Beyond its simplicity and structural importance, this question is well-motivated by the current state-of-the-art of fast algorithms for ∞ oblivious routings that reduce to the expander-case which is in turn solved by electrical flow routing. Our main result proves that the electrical routing is an O(-1 m)-competitive oblivious routing in the 1- and ∞-norms. We further observe that the oblivious routing is O(2 m)-competitive in the 2-norm and, in fact, O( m)-competitive if 2-localization is O( m) which is widely believed. Using these three upper bounds, we can smoothly interpolate to obtain upper bounds for every p ∈ [2, ∞] and q given by 1/p + 1/q = 1. Assuming 2-localization in O( m), we obtain that in p and q, the electrical oblivious routing is O(-(1-2/p) m) competitive. Using the currently known result for 2-localization, this ratio deteriorates by at most a sublogarithmic factor for every p, q ≠ 2. We complement our upper bounds with lower bounds that show that the electrical routing for any such p and q is (-(1-2/p) m)-competitive. This renders our results in 1 and ∞ unconditionally tight up to constants, and the result in any p- and q-norm to be tight in case of 2-localization in O( m).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…