Ajtai's theorem for T22(R) and pebble games with backtracking
Abstract
We introduce a pebble game extended by backtracking options for one of the two players (called Prover) and reduce the provability of the pigeonhole principle for a generic predicate R in the bounded arithmetic T22(R) to the existence of a particular kind of winning strategy (called oblivious) for Prover in the game. While the unprovability of the said principle in T22(R) is an immediate consequence of a celebrated theorem of Ajtai (which deals with a stronger theory T2(R)), up-to-date no methods working for T22(R) directly (in particular without switching lemma) are known. Although the full analysis of the introduced pebble game is left open, as a first step towards resolving it, we restrict ourselves to a simplified version of the game. In this case, Prover can use only two pebbles and move in an extremely oblivious way. Besides, a series of backtracks can be made only once during a play. Under these assumptions, we show that no strategy of Prover can be winning.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.