Intermediate models with deep failure of choice
Abstract
The following question was asked by Grigorieff: Suppose V is a ZFC model and V[G] is a set-generic extension of V. Can there be a ZF model N so that V⊂ N ⊂ V[G] yet N is not equal to V(A) for any set A∈ V[G]? The first such model was constructed by Karagila. This is the so-called Bristol model, an intermediate model between L and L[c] where c is a Cohen-generic real over L. Karagila further proves that the Kinna-Wager degree is unbounded in this model. We prove that such an intermediate extension can be found in a Cohen-generic extension of any ground model, fully resolving Grigorieff's question. That is, let V be any ZF model and c a Cohen-generic real over V. We prove that there is an intermediate ZF-model V⊂ N ⊂ V[c] so that N is not equal to V(A) for any set A∈ V[c], the Kinna-Wagner degree of N is unbounded and, in particular, no set forcing in N forces the axiom of choice. Therefore, there are class many different intermediate models of ZF between V and V[c].
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.