An analogue of Reed's conjecture for digraphs
Abstract
Reed in 1998 conjectured that every graph G satisfies (G) ≤ (G)+1+ω(G)2 . As a partial result, he proved the existence of > 0 for which every graph G satisfies (G) ≤ (1-)((G)+1)+ω(G) . We propose an analogue conjecture for digraphs. Given a digraph D, we denote by (D) the dichromatic number of D, which is the minimum number of colours needed to partition D into acyclic induced subdigraphs. We let ω(D) denote the size of the largest biclique (a set of vertices inducing a complete digraph) of D and (D) = v∈ V(D) d+(v) · d-(v). We conjecture that every digraph D satisfies (D) ≤ (D)+1+ω(D)2 , which if true implies Reed's conjecture. As a partial result, we prove the existence of >0 for which every digraph D satisfies (D) ≤ (1-)((D)+1)+ω(D) . This implies both Reed's result and an independent result of Harutyunyan and Mohar for oriented graphs. To obtain this upper bound on , we prove that every digraph D with ω(D) > 23((D)+1), where (D) = v∈ V(D) (d+(v),d-(v)), admits an acyclic set of vertices intersecting each biclique of D, which generalises a result of King. We finally give a short proof that all oriented graphs D satisfy (D) ≤ 22 (D) + 2, improving on a result of Golowich.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.