Mildly Super-Eddington Accretion Onto Slowly-Spinning Black Holes Explains the X-Ray Weakness of the Little Red Dots

Abstract

JWST has revealed a population of low-luminosity AGN at z>4 in compact, red hosts (the "Little Red Dots", or LRDs), which are largely undetected in X-rays. We investigate this phenomenon using GRRMHD simulations of super-Eddington accretion onto a SMBH with M=107 \, M at z6, representing the median population; the SEDs that we obtain are intrinsically X-ray weak. The highest levels of X-ray weakness occur in SMBHs accreting at mildly super-Eddington rates (1.4<f Edd<4) with zero spin, viewed at angles >30 from the pole. X-ray bolometric corrections in the observed 2-10 keV band reach 104 at z=6, 5 times higher than the highest constraint from X-ray stacking. Most SEDs are extraordinarily steep and soft in the X-rays (median photon index =3.1, mode of =4.4). SEDs strong in the X-rays have harder spectra with a high-energy bump when viewed near the hot (>108 K) and highly-relativistic jet, whereas X-ray weak SEDs lack this feature. Viewing a SMBH within 10 of its pole, where beaming enhances the X-ray emission, has a 1.5\% probability, matching the LRD X-ray detection rate. Next-generation observatories like AXIS will detect X-ray weak LRDs at z6 from any viewing angle. Although many SMBHs in the LRDs are already estimated to accrete at super-Eddington rates, our model explains 50\% of their population by requiring that their masses are overestimated by a mere factor of 3. In summary, we suggest that LRDs host slowly spinning SMBHs accreting at mildly super-Eddington rates, with large covering factors and broad emission lines enhanced by strong winds, providing a self-consistent explanation for their X-ray weakness and complementing other models.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…