Number of Subgraphs and Their Converses in Tournaments and New Digraph Polynomials

Abstract

An oriented graph D is converse invariant if, for any tournament T, the number of copies of D in T is equal to that of its converse -D. El Sahili and Ghazo Hanna [J. Graph Theory 102 (2023), 684-701] showed that any oriented graph D with maximum degree at most 2 is converse invariant. They proposed a question: Can we characterize all converse invariant oriented graphs? In this paper, we introduce a digraph polynomial and employ it to give a necessary condition for an oriented graph to be converse invariant. This polynomial serves as a cornerstone in proving all the results presented in this paper. In particular, we characterize all orientations of trees with diameter at most 3 that are converse invariant. We also show that all orientations of regular graphs are not converse invariant if D and -D have different degree sequences. In addition, in contrast to the findings of El Sahili and Ghazo Hanna, we prove that every connected graph G with maximum degree at least 3, admits an orientation D of G such that D is not converse invariant. We pose one conjecture.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…