Evolution of Hα Equivalent Widths from z 0.4-2.2: implications for star formation and legacy surveys with Roman and Euclid
Abstract
We investigate the `intrinsic' Hα EW distributions of z 0.4 - 2.2 narrowband-selected Hα samples from HiZELS and DAWN using a forward modeling approach. We find an EW - stellar mass anti-correlation with steepening slopes -0.180.03 to -0.24+0.06-0.08 at z 0.4 and z 2.2, respectively. Typical EW increases as (1+z)1.78+0.22-0.23 for a 1010 M emitter from 15+2.4-2.3A (z 0.4) to 67.7+10.4-10.0A (z 2.2) and is steeper with decreasing stellar mass highlighting the high EW nature of low-mass high-z systems. We model this redshift evolving anti-correlation, W0(M,z), and find it produces Hα luminosity and SFR functions strongly consistent with observations validating the model and allowing us to use W0(M,z) to investigate the relative contribution of Hα emitters towards cosmic SF. We find EW0 > 200 A emitters contribute significantly to cosmic SF activity at z 1.5 - 2 making up 40% of total SF consistent with sSFR > 10-8.5 yr-1 ( 45 - 55%). Overall, this highlights the importance of high EW systems at high-z. Our W0(M,z) model also reproduces the cosmic sSFR evolution found in simulations and observations and show that tension between the two can simply arise from selection effects in observations. Lastly, we forecast Roman and Euclid grism surveys using W0(M,z) including observational efficiency and limiting resolution effects where we predict 24000 and 30000 0.5 < z < 1.9 Hα emitters per deg-2, respectively, down to >5×10-17 erg s-1 cm-2 including 107.2 - 8 M galaxies at z > 1 with EW0 >1000A. Both Roman and Euclid will enable us to observe with unprecedented detail some of the most bursty/high EW, low-mass star-forming galaxies near cosmic noon.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.