A consistently adaptive trust-region method

Abstract

Adaptive trust-region methods attempt to maintain strong convergence guarantees without depending on conservative estimates of problem properties such as Lipschitz constants. However, on close inspection, one can show existing adaptive trust-region methods have theoretical guarantees with severely suboptimal dependence on problem properties such as the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. For example, TRACE developed by Curtis et al. obtains a O(f L3/2 ε-3/2) + O(1) iteration bound where L is the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Compared with the optimal O(f L1/2 ε-3/2) bound this is suboptimal with respect to L. We present the first adaptive trust-region method which circumvents this issue and requires at most O( f L1/2 ε-3/2) + O(1) iterations to find an ε-approximate stationary point, matching the optimal iteration bound up to an additive logarithmic term. Our method is a simple variant of a classic trust-region method and in our experiments performs competitively with both ARC and a classical trust-region method.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…