Taxicab distance based best-worst method for multi-criteria decision-making: An analytical approach

Abstract

The best-worst method is a well-known distance based multi-criteria decision-making method used for computing the weights of decision criteria. This article provides a comprehensive analytical examination of the taxicab distance based model of the method, with the objectives of investigating the uniqueness of these solutions, and performing a rigorous consistency analysis. To achieve this, an optimal modification based optimization problem, equivalent to the original one, is first formulated. This reformulated problem is then solved analytically, and the optimal weight sets are derived from its solutions. Contrary to the prevailing understanding derived from numerical experiments with the taxicab model, our analytical framework proves that the model can, in fact, lead to multiple optimal weight sets, and we formally establish the conditions for this occurrence. A mixed-integer linear programming model is then employed to compute the consistency index. A decision-maker-aided selection strategy is also proposed for addressing non-uniqueness of optimal weight sets. In addition, threshold values of the consistency ratio to assess the admissibility of given preferences are also established. This framework provides a solid mathematical foundation that enhances the understanding of the model and eliminates the requirement for optimization software. By significantly improving the model's computational efficiency, it enables implementation in large-scale, dynamic real-world applications such as electricity market bidding strategies and portfolio rebalancing under market volatility. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through numerical examples, and its practical applicability is illustrated via a smartphone selection problem.