A strong structural stability of C2k+1-free graphs

Abstract

F\"uredi and Gunderson showed that ex(n, C2k+1) is achieved only on Kn2, n2 if n 4k-2. It is natural to study how far a C2k+1-free graph is from being bipartite.Let T*(r, n) be obtained by adding a suspension Kr with 1 suspension point to Kn-r+12, n-r+12. We show that for integers r, k with 3 r 2k-4 and n 20(r+2)2k, if G is a C2k+1-free n-vertex graph with e(G) e(T*(r, n)), then G is obtained by adding suspensions to a bipartite graph one by one and the total number of vertices in all suspensions minus intersection points is no more than r-1. In other words, G=Bi=1p Gi, where B is a bipartite graph, G1 is a suspension to B, Gj is a suspension to Bi=1j-1 Gi for 2 j p and Σi=1p V(Gi)-V(Gi) V(Bi=1j-1 Gi) r-1. Furthermore, Σi=1p V(Gi)-V(Gi) V(Bi=1j-1 Gi) = r-1 if and only if G=T*(r, n). Let d2(G)=\|T|: T⊂eq V(G), G-T \ is bipartite\ and γ2(G)=\|E|: E⊂eq E(G), G-E \ is bipartite\. Our structural stability result implies that d2(G) r-1 and γ2(G) r2 2+r2 2 under the same condition, which is a recent result of Ren-Wang-Wang-Yang [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 38 (2024)]. They proved d2(G) r-1 and γ2(G) r2 2+r2 2 separately. We introduce a new concept strong-2k-core which is the key that we can give a stronger structural stability result but a simpler proof.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…