Explicit Folded Reed-Solomon and Multiplicity Codes Achieve Relaxed Generalized Singleton Bounds

Abstract

In this paper, we prove that explicit FRS codes and multiplicity codes achieve relaxed generalized Singleton bounds for list size L1. Specifically, we show the following: (1) FRS code of length n and rate R over the alphabet Fqs with distinct evaluation points is (LL+1(1-sRs-L+1),L) list-decodable (LD) for list size L∈[s]. (2) Multiplicity code of length n and rate R over the alphabet Fps with distinct evaluation points is (LL+1(1-sRs-L+1),L) LD for list size L∈[s]. Choosing s=(1/ε2) and L=O(1/ε), our results imply that both FRS codes and multiplicity codes achieve LD capacity 1-R-ε with optimal list size O(1/ε). This exponentially improves the previous state of the art (1/ε)O(1/ε) established by Kopparty et. al. (FOCS 2018) and Tamo (IEEE TIT, 2024). In particular, our results on FRS codes fully resolve a open problem proposed by Guruswami and Rudra (STOC 2006). Furthermore, our results imply the first explicit constructions of (1-R-ε,O(1/ε)) LD codes of rate R with poly-sized alphabets. Our method can also be extended to analyze the list-recoverability (LR) of FRS codes. We provide a tighter radius upper bound that FRS codes cannot be (L+1-L+1(1-mRm-1)+o(1),, L) LR where m=(L+1). We conjecture this bound is almost tight when L+1=a for any a∈N 2. To give some evidences, we show FRS codes are (12-sRs-2,2,3) LR, which proves the tightness in the smallest non-trivial case. Our bound refutes the possibility that FRS codes could achieve LR capacity (1-R-ε, , O(ε)). This implies an intrinsic separation between LD and LR of FRS codes.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…