On the holes in In for symmetric bilinear forms in characteristic 2

Abstract

Let F be a field. Following the resolution of Milnor's conjecture relating the graded Witt ring of F to its mod-2 Milnor K-theory, a major problem in the theory of symmetric bilinear forms is to understand, for any positive integer n, the low-dimensional part of In(F), the nth power of the fundamental ideal in the Witt ring of F. In a 2004 paper, Karpenko used methods from the theory of algebraic cycles to show that if b is a non-zero anisotropic symmetric bilinear form of dimension < 2n+1 representing an element of In(F), then b has dimension 2n+1 - 2i for some 1 ≤ i ≤ n. When i = n, a classical result of Arason and Pfister says that b is similar to an n-fold Pfister form. At the next level, it has been conjectured that if n ≥ 2 and i= n-1, then b is isometric to the tensor product of an (n-2)-fold Pfister form and a 6-dimensional form of trivial discriminant. This has only been shown to be true, however, when n = 2, or when n = 3 and char(F) ≠ 2 (another result of Pfister). In the present article, we prove the conjecture for all values of n in the case where char(F) =2. In addition, we give a short and elementary proof of Karpenko's theorem in the characteristic-2 case, rendering it free from the use of subtle algebraic-geometric tools. Finally, we consider the question of whether additional dimension gaps can appear among the anisotropic forms of dimension ≥ 2n+1 representing an element of In(F). When char(F) ≠ 2, a result of Vishik asserts that there are no such gaps, but the situation seems to be less clear when char(F) = 2.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…