A sparse resolution of the DiPerna-Majda gap problem for 2D Euler equations
Abstract
A central question which originates in the celebrated work in the 1980's of DiPerna and Majda asks what is the optimal decay f > 0 such that uniform rates |ω|(Q) ≤ f(|Q|) of the vorticity maximal functions guarantee strong convergence without concentrations of approximate solutions to energy-conserving weak solutions of the 2D Euler equations with vortex sheet initial data. A famous result of Majda (1993) shows f(r) = [ (1/r)]-1/2, r<1/2, as the optimal decay for distinguished sign vortex sheets. In the general setting of mixed sign vortex sheets, DiPerna and Majda (1987) established f(r) = [ (1/r)]-α with α > 1 as a sufficient condition for the lack of concentrations, while the expected gap α ∈ (1/2, 1] remains as an open question. In this paper we resolve the DiPerna-Majda 2D gap problem: In striking contrast to the well-known case of distinguished sign vortex sheets, we identify f(r) = [ (1/r)]-1 as the optimal regularity for mixed sign vortex sheets that rules out concentrations. For the proof, we propose a novel method to construct explicitly solutions with mixed sign to the 2D Euler equations in such a way that wild behaviour creates within the relevant geometry of sparse cubes (i.e., these cubes are not necessarily pairwise disjoint, but their possible overlappings can be controlled in a sharp fashion). Such a strategy is inspired by the recent work of the first author and Milman DM where strong connections between energy conservation and sparseness are established.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.