Chromatic profiles of odd cycles
Abstract
Erdos and Simonovits asked the following question: For an integer c≥ 2 and a family of non-bipartite graphs F, what is the infimum of α such that any F-free n-vertex graph with n large enough and minimum degree at least α n has chromatic number at most c? Denote the infimum as δ(F, c). A fundamental result of Erdos, Stone and Simonovits implies that if 3 r+1=(F)=\ (F): F∈ F\, then for any c r-1, δ(F, c)=1-1 r. So the remaining challenge is to determine δ(F, c) for c (F)-1. Most previous known results are under the condition that c= (F)-1. When c (F), the only known exact results are δ(K3, 3) by H\"aggkvist and Jin, and δ(K3, c) for every c4 by Brandt and Thomass\'e, δ(Kr, r) and δ(Kr, r+1) by Goddard and Lyle, and Nikiforov. Combining results of Thomassen and Ma, ((c+1)-8(k+1))=δ(C2k+1, c)=O(kc) for c 3. In this paper, we determine δ(C2k+1, c) for all c 2 and k 3c+4. We also obtain the following corollary. If G is a graph on n vertices with c 3, (G)>c and δ(G)> n 2c+2, then C2k+1 ⊂ G for all k∈ [3c+4, n 108(c+1)c]. Methods to obtain all previous known results related to odd cycles cannot be applied to solve for δ(C2k+1, c) for c 3.The innovation of our proof is to give the concept of a `strong 2k-core'. We think that this concept grasps the essence of the problem and it makes our proof concise and elementary (we do not need to borrow any other tools). How to define a proper `core' might be a key to this type of questions.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.