Induced subgraphs of Kr-free graphs and the Erdos--Rogers problem

Abstract

For two graphs F,H and a positive integer n, the function fF,H(n) denotes the largest m such that every H-free graph on n vertices contains an F-free induced subgraph on m vertices. This function has been extensively studied in the last 60 years when F and H are cliques and became known as the Erdos-Rogers function. Recently, Balogh, Chen and Luo, and Mubayi and Verstra\"ete initiated the systematic study of this function in the case where F is a general graph. Answering, in a strong form, a question of Mubayi and Verstra\"ete, we prove that for every positive integer r and every Kr-1-free graph F, there exists some F>0 such that fF,Kr(n)=O(n1/2-F). This result is tight in two ways. Firstly, it is no longer true if F contains Kr-1 as a subgraph. Secondly, we show that for all r≥ 4 and >0, there exists a Kr-1-free graph F for which fF,Kr(n)=(n1/2-). Along the way of proving this, we show in particular that for every graph F with minimum degree t, we have fF,K4(n)=(n1/2-6/t). This answers (in a strong form) another question of Mubayi and Verstra\"ete. Finally, we prove that there exist absolute constants 0<c<C such that for each r≥ 4, if F is a bipartite graph with sufficiently large minimum degree, then (nc r)≤ fF,Kr(n)≤ O(nC r). This shows that for graphs F with large minimum degree, the behaviour of fF,Kr(n) is drastically different from that of the corresponding off-diagonal Ramsey number fK2,Kr(n).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…