On the number of H-free hypergraphs

Abstract

Two central problems in extremal combinatorics are concerned with estimating the number ex(n,H), the size of the largest H-free hypergraph on n vertices, and the number forb(n,H) of H-free hypergraph on n vertices. While it is known that forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) for k-uniform hypergraphs that are not k-partite, estimates for hypergraphs that are k-partite (or degenerate) are not nearly as tight. In a recent breakthrough, Ferber, McKinley, and Samotij proved that for many degenerate hypergraphs H, forb(n, H) = 2O(ex(n,H)). However, there are few known instances of degenerate hypergraphs H for which forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) holds. In this paper, we show that forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) holds for a wide class of degenerate hypergraphs known as 2-contractible hypertrees. This is the first known infinite family of degenerate hypergraphs H for which forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) holds. As a corollary of our main results, we obtain a surprisingly sharp estimate of forb(n,C(k))=2(-12+o(1))nk-1 for the k-uniform linear -cycle, for all pairs k≥ 5, ≥ 3, thus settling a question of Balogh, Narayanan, and Skokan affirmatively for all k≥ 5, ≥ 3. Our methods also lead to some related sharp results on the corresponding random Turan problem. As a key ingredient of our proofs, we develop a novel supersaturation variant of the delta systems method for set systems, which may be of independent interest.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…