Matsuda monoids and Artin's primitive root conjecture

Abstract

Let M ⊂eq N0 be the additive submonoid generated by 2 and 3. In a recent work, Christensen, Gipson and Kulosman proved that M is not a Matsuda monoid of type 2 and type 3 and they have raised the question of whether M is a Matsuda monoid of type for any prime . Assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis, Daileda showed that M is not a Matsuda monoid of type for any prime . In this article, we will establish this result unconditionally using its' connection with Artin's primitive root conjecture and this resolves the question of Christensen, Gipson and Kulosman.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…