On the equality of generalized Bajraktarevi\'c means under first-order differentiability assumptions

Abstract

In this paper we consider the equality problem of generalized Bajraktarevi\'c means, i.e., we are going to solve the functional equation equationE0* f(-1)(p1(x1)f(x1)+…+pn(xn)f(xn)p1(x1)+…+pn(xn))=g(-1)(q1(x1)g(x1)+…+qn(xn)g(xn)q1(x1)+…+qn(xn)), equation which holds for all x=(x1,…,xn)∈ In, where n≥ 2, I is a nonempty open real interval, the unknown functions f,g:I are strictly monotone, f(-1) and g(-1) denote their generalized left inverses, respectively, and the vector-valued weight functions p=(p1,…,pn):I+n and q=(q1,…,qn):I+n are also unknown. This equality problem in the symmetric two-variable case (i.e., when n=2 and p1=p2, q1=q2) was solved under sixth-order regularity assumptions by Losonczi in 1999. The authors of this paper improved this result in 2023 by reaching the same conclusion assuming only first-order differentiability. In the nonsymmetric case, assuming third-order differentiability of f, g and the first-order differentiability of at least three of the functions p1,…,pn, Gr\"unwald and P\'ales proved that 0 holds if and only if there exist four constants a,b,c,d∈R with ad≠ bc such that cf+d>0, g=af+bcf+d,and q=(cf+d)p (∈\1,…,n\). The main goal of this paper is to establish the same conclusion under first-order differentiability.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…