A theoretical investigation of far-infrared fine structure lines at z>6 and of the origin of the [OIII]88/[CII]158 enhancement

Abstract

[Abridged] The [OIII]88μ m/[CII]158μ m and [OIII]88μ m/[NII]122μ m luminosity ratios have shown to be promising tracers of the ionisation state and gas-phase metallicity of the ISM. Observations of galaxies at redshift z > 6 show peculiarly higher [OIII]88μ m/[CII]158μ m luminosity ratios compared to local sources. No model has so far successfully managed to match the observed emission from both [OIII]88μ m and [CII]158μ m as well as their ratio. We use Cloudy to model the [CII]158μ m, [OIII]88μ m, [NII]122μ m and [NIII]57μ m emission lines of Ponos: a high-resolution (mgas = 883.4\, M) cosmological zoom-in simulation of a galaxy at redshift z = 6.5, which is post-processed using kramses-rt. We modify Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen abundances in our Cloudy models to obtain C/O and N/O abundance ratios respectively lower and higher than Solar, more in line with recent high-z observational constraints. We find [OIII]88μ m/[CII]158μ m luminosity ratios that are a factor of 5 higher compared to models assuming solar abundances. Additionally, we find an overall better agreement of the simulation with high-z observational constraints of the [CII]158μ m-SFR and [OIII]88μ m-SFR relations. This shows that a lower C/O abundance ratio is essential to reproduce the enhanced [OIII]88μ m/[CII]158μ m luminosity ratios observed at z > 6. By assuming a super-solar N/O ratio, motivated by recent z > 6 JWST observations, our models yield an [OIII]88μ m/[NII]122μ m ratio of 1.3, which, according to current theoretical models, would be more appropriate for a galaxy with a lower ionisation parameter than the one we estimated for Ponos.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…