Product Structure and Tree-Decompositions

Abstract

This paper explores the structure of graphs defined by an excluded minor or an excluded odd minor through the lens of graph products and tree-decompositions. We prove that every graph excluding a fixed odd minor is contained in the strong product of two graphs each with bounded treewidth. For graphs excluding a fixed minor, we strengthen the result by showing that every such graph is contained in the strong product of two digraphs with bounded indegree and with bounded treewidth. This result has the advantage that the product now has bounded degeneracy. In the setting of 3-term products, we show that every Kt-minor-free graph is contained in H1 H2 Kc(t) where tw(Hi)≤ t-2. This treewidth bound is close to tight: in any such result with tw(Hi) bounded, both H1 and H2 can be forced to contain any graph of treewidth t-5, implying tw(H1)≥ t-5 and tw(H2)≥ t-5. Analogous lower and upper bounds are shown for any excluded minor, where the minimum possible bound on tw(Hi) is tied to the treedepth of the excluded minor. Subgraphs of the product of two graphs with bounded treewidth have two tree-decompositions where any bag from the first decomposition intersects any bag from the second decomposition in a bounded number, k, of vertices, so called k-orthogonal tree-decompositions. We show that graphs excluding a fixed odd-minor have a tree-decomposition and a path-decomposition that are O(1)-orthogonal. This implies that such graphs have a tree-decomposition in which each bag has bounded pathwidth. This result is best possible in that `pathwidth' cannot be replaced by `bandwidth' or `treedepth'. Moreover, we characterize the minor-closed classes that have a tree-decomposition in which each bag has bounded bandwidth, or each bag has bounded treedepth.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…