On sum rules for semi-leptonic b c and b u decays

Abstract

The semi-leptonic b c l processes are receiving a lot of attention, as the lepton flavor universality violation has been hinted by the measured ratios RD(*) = (B D(*) τ)/(B D(*) ) for = e,μ. Recently, it has also been pointed out that the baryonic counterpart, R_c = (b c τ)/ (b c ), has a strong correlation with RD(*), referred to as the R ratio sum rule in this paper. The correlation is almost independent of the new physics (NP) contributions and hence can predict R_c from the measured RD(*). On the other hand, we have fewer measurements and/or theoretical studies of the semi-leptonic b u l processes, although the same arguments can be applied to the ratios Rπ, R, and Rp as above. Since these processes are measurable at the ongoing LHCb run-3 and/or Belle~II experiments, precise studies on them are important as well. In this paper, we obtain the semi-analytic formulae for all the aforementioned RX ratios in the presence of model-independent NP contributions by using the available lattice QCD and/or light-cone sum rule fits to the form factors. Two novel points are highlighted: (i) We evaluate uncertainties of RX including both the Standard Model (SM) and NP terms, inherited from the form factor fits, and discuss how the uncertainties affect the R ratio sum rules. (ii) We obtain the R ratio sum rule among the semi-leptonic b u l processes for the first time, which provides a complementary motivation for observing these processes. In addition, based on our model-independent results, we investigate how the different NP scenarios work in the b c and b u sectors and perform a combined study in the framework of SM effective field theory with specific flavor symmetries.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…