Modelling Cosmic Rays Flux with Pierre Auger and Telescope Array Data in f(R) and f(Q) Theories of Gravity

Abstract

We investigate the effects of the magnetic field and the redshift on the propagation of galactic and extragalactic cosmic rays (CRs) in a modified theory of gravity (MTG) and an alternative theory of gravity (ATG) framework. For this purpose, we consider the f(R) gravity and the f(Q) gravity theories. We utilise these two MTG and ATG to compute the density enhancement factor of CRs as a function of the magnetic field and the redshift. For this work, we take the magnetic field strength from 1-100 nG, while 0-2.5 for the redshift. For each of these parameters, we take 100 bins within their considered range for the computation. The enhancement parameter for the mixed composition of heavy nuclei up to Fe is also taken into account for this work. Further, we compute the E3 magnified diffusive flux for 150 sources separated by a distance ds for the different cosmological models. For the fitting with observational data from the Pierre Auger Observatory (PAO) and Telescope Array (TA), we parameterized some set that consists of the redshift z, the separation distances ds between the 150 sources, and the maximum cutoff energy Emax. For each case, a residue plot and 2 value are also added to check the goodness of fitting. A comparative analysis of considered models has been performed in each of the cases along with the model. The considered MTG and ATG models produce notable and fascinating outcomes, with the f(Q) model showing the highest CR density enhancement and the lowest reduced chi-squared value when fitted to PAO and TA data of UHECRs flux. This research provides new perspectives on the connections between high-energy physics, astrophysics, and cosmology.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…