Does connected wedge imply distillable entanglement?

Abstract

The Ryu-Takayanagi formula predicts that two boundary subsystems A and C can exhibit large mutual information I(A:C) even when they are spatially disconnected on the boundary and separated by a buffer subsystem B, as long as A and C have connected entanglement wedge in the bulk. However, whether the reduced state AC contains distillable EPR pairs has remained a longstanding open problem. In this work, we resolve this problem by showing that: i) there is no LO-distillable entanglement at leading order in GN, suggesting the absence of bipartite entanglement in a holographic mixed state AC, and ii) one-shot, one-way LOCC-distillable entanglement is given at leading order by locally accessible information JW(A|C), which is related to the entanglement wedge cross section EW involving the (third) purifying system B via JW(A|C) = SA - EW(A:B). Namely, we demonstrate that a connected entanglement wedge does not necessarily imply nonzero distillable entanglement in one-shot, one-way LOCC. We also show that entanglement of formation EF(A:C) is given by EW(A:C) at leading order in holography.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…