Tight bounds for intersection-reverse sequences, edge-ordered graphs and applications

Abstract

In 2006, Marcus and Tardos proved that if A1,…,An are cyclic orders on some subsets of a set of n symbols such that the common elements of any two distinct orders Ai and Aj appear in reversed cyclic order in Ai and Aj, then Σi |Ai|=O(n3/2 n). This result is tight up to the logarithmic factor and has since become an important tool in Discrete Geometry. We improve this to the optimal bound O(n3/2). In fact, we show that if A1,…,An are linear orders on some subsets of a set of n symbols such that no three symbols appear in the same order in any two distinct linear orders, then Σi |Ai|=O(n3/2). Using this result, we resolve several open problems in Discrete Geometry and Extremal Graph Theory as follows. We prove that every n-vertex topological graph that does not contain a self-crossing four-cycle has O(n3/2) edges. This resolves a problem of Marcus and Tardos from 2006. We also show that n pseudo-circles in the plane can be cut into O(n3/2) pseudo-segments, which, in turn, implies new bounds on point-circle incidences and on other geometric problems. Moreover, we prove that the edge-ordered Tur\'an number of the four-cycle C41243 is (n3/2). This answers a question of Gerbner, Methuku, Nagy, P\'alv\"olgyi, Tardos and Vizer. Using different methods, we determine the largest possible extremal number that an edge-ordered forest of order chromatic number two can have. Kucheriya and Tardos showed that every such graph has extremal number at most n2O( n), and conjectured that this can be improved to n( n)O(1). We disprove their conjecture by showing that for every C>0, there exists an edge-ordered tree of order chromatic number two whose extremal number is (n 2C n).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…