Multipartite nearly orthogonal sets over finite fields
Abstract
For a field F and integers d, k and , a set A ⊂eq Fd is called (k,)-nearly orthogonal if all vectors in A are non-self-orthogonal and every k+1 vectors in A contain + 1 pairwise orthogonal vectors. Recently, Haviv, Mattheus, Milojevi\'c and Wigderson have improved the lower bound on nearly orthogonal sets over finite fields, using counting arguments and a hypergraph container lemma. They showed that for every prime p and an integer , there is a constant δ(p,) such that for every field F of characteristic p and for all integers d ≥ k ≥ + 1, Fd contains a (k,)-nearly orthogonal set of size dδ k / k. This nearly matches an upper bound d+kk coming from Ramsey theory. Moreover, they proved the same lower bound for the size of a largest set A where for any two subsets of A of size k+1 each, there is a vector in one of the subsets orthogonal to a vector in the other one. We prove a common generalisation of this result, showing that essentially the same lower bound holds for the size of a largest set A ⊂eq Fd with the stronger property that given any family of subsets A1, …, A+1 ⊂eq A, each of size k+1, we can find a vector in each Ai such that they are all pairwise orthogonal. Rather than combining both counting and container arguments, we make use of a multipartite asymmetric container lemma that allows for non-uniform co-degree conditions. This lemma was first discovered by Campos, Coulson, Serra and W\"otzel, and we provide a new and short proof for this lemma.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.