Asymptotically sharp bounds for cancellative and union-free hypergraphs

Abstract

An r-graph is called t-cancellative if for arbitrary t+2 distinct edges A1,…,At,B,C, it holds that (i=1t Ai) B≠ (i=1t Ai) C; it is called t-union-free if for arbitrary two distinct subsets A,B, each consisting of at most t edges, it holds that A∈A A≠ B∈B B. Let Ct(n,r) and Ut(n,r) denote the maximum number of edges that can be contained in an n-vertex t-cancellative and t-union-free r-graph, respectively. The study of Ct(n,r) and Ut(n,r) has a long history, dating back to the classic works of Erdos and Katona, and Erdos and Moser in the 1970s. In 2020, Shangguan and Tamo showed that C2(t-1)(n,tk)=(nk) and Ut+1(n,tk)=(nk) for all t 2 and k 2. In this paper, we determine the asymptotics of these two functions up to a lower order term, by showing that for all t 2 and k 2, align* n→∞C2(t-1)(n,tk)nk=n→∞Ut+1(n,tk)nk=1k!· 1tk-1k-1. align* Previously, it was only known by a result of F\"uredi in 2012 that n→∞C2(n,4)n2=16. To prove the lower bounds of the limits, we utilize a powerful framework developed recently by Delcourt and Postle, and independently by Glock, Joos, Kim, K\"uhn, and Lichev, which shows the existence of near-optimal hypergraph packings avoiding certain small configurations, and to prove the upper bounds, we apply a novel counting argument that connects C2(t-1)(n,tk) to a classic result of Kleitman and Frankl on a special case of the famous Erdos Matching Conjecture.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…