Upper bounds on diagonal Ramsey numbers [after Campos, Griffiths, Morris, and Sahasrabudhe]

Abstract

Ramsey's theorem states that if N is sufficiently large, then no matter how one colors the edges among N vertices with two colors, there are always k vertices spanning edges in only one color. Given this theorem, it is natural to ask ``how large is sufficiently large?'' Ramsey's original proof showed that N=k! is sufficient, and five years later Erdos and Szekeres improved this bound to N=4k. And then progress stalled for almost 90 years. In this survey, I present the history of the problem and discuss some of the ideas used in the recent breakthrough of Campos--Griffiths--Morris--Sahasrabudhe, who proved that N=3.993k is sufficient. In addition, I discuss the subsequent work of Balister, Bollob\'as, Campos, Griffiths, Hurley, Morris, Sahasrabudhe, and Tiba, who gave an alternative, and more conceptual, proof.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…