Characterizing and Transforming DAGs within the I-LCA Framework
Abstract
We explore the connections between clusters and least common ancestors (LCAs) in directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), focusing on the interplay between so-called I-lca-relevant DAGs and DAGs with the I-lca-property. Here, I denotes a set of integers. In I-lca-relevant DAGs, each vertex is the unique LCA for some subset A of leaves of size |A|∈ I, whereas in a DAG with the I-lca-property there exists a unique LCA for every subset A of leaves satisfying |A|∈ I. We elaborate on the difference between these two properties and establish their close relationship to pre-I-ary and I-ary set systems. This, in turn, generalizes results established for (pre-)binary and k-ary set systems. Moreover, we build upon recently established results that use a simple operator , enabling the transformation of arbitrary DAGs into I-lca-relevant DAGs. This process reduces unnecessary complexity while preserving key structural properties of the original DAG. The set CG consists of all clusters in a DAG G, where clusters correspond to the descendant leaves of vertices. While in some cases CH = CG when transforming G into an I-lca-relevant DAG H, it often happens that certain clusters in CG do not appear as clusters in H. To understand this phenomenon in detail, we characterize the subset of clusters in CG that remain in H for DAGs G with the I-lca-property. Furthermore, we show that the set W of vertices required to transform G into H = G W is uniquely determined for such DAGs. This, in turn, allows us to show that the ``shortcut-free'' version of the transformed DAG H is always a tree or a galled-tree whenever CG represents the clustering system of a tree or galled-tree and G has the I-lca-property. In the latter case CH = CG always holds.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.