Almost-full transversals in equi-n-squares

Abstract

In 1975, Stein made a wide generalisation of the Ryser-Brualdi-Stein conjecture on transversals in Latin squares, conjecturing that every equi-n-square (an n× n array filled with n symbols where each symbol appears exactly n times) has a transversal of size n-1. That is, it should have a collection of n-1 entries that share no row, column, or symbol. In 2017, Aharoni, Berger, Kotlar, and Ziv showed that equi-n-squares always have a transversal with size at least 2n/3. In 2019, Pokrovskiy and Sudakov disproved Stein's conjecture by constructing equi-n-squares without a transversal of size n- n42, but asked whether Stein's conjecture is approximately true. I.e., does an equi-n-square always have a transversal with size (1-o(1))n? We answer this question in the positive. More specifically, we improve both known bounds, showing that there exist equi-n-squares with no transversal of size n-(n) and that every equi-n-square contains n-n1-(1) disjoint transversals of size n-n1-(1).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…