The Frankl-Pach upper bound is not tight for any uniformity

Abstract

For any positive integers n d+1 3, what is the maximum size of a (d+1)-uniform set system in [n] with VC-dimension at most d? In 1984, Frankl and Pach initiated the study of this fundamental problem and provided an upper bound nd via an elegant algebraic proof. Surprisingly, in 2007, Mubayi and Zhao showed that when n is sufficiently large and d is a prime power, the Frankl-Pach upper bound is not tight. They also remarked that their method requires d to be a prime power, and asked for new ideas to improve the Frankl-Pach upper bound without extra assumptions on n and d. In this paper, we provide an improvement for any d 2 and n 2d+2, which demonstrates that the long-standing Frankl-Pach upper bound nd is not tight for any uniformity. Our proof combines a simple yet powerful polynomial method and structural analysis.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…