Towards a Theory of SIC-like Phenomena: Regular Bouquets and Generalised Heisenberg Groups

Abstract

We lay the foundations for a broad algebraic theory encompassing SICs in the hope of elucidating their heuristic connections with Stark units. What emerges is a greatly generalised set-up with added structure and potential for applications in other areas. Let A and B be finite modules for a commutative ring R, C a finite abelian group and λ: A× B→ C an R-balanced bilinear pairing. The main constructs are the generalised Heisenberg group H= H(A,B,C,λ) attached to these data (an abstract central extension of A B by C) which plays the role of the Weyl-Heisenberg group in SIC theory, together with its canonical, unitary Schr\"odinger representations. The SIC itself is replaced by an H-orbit of complex lines in the representation space, termed a `bouquet'. The overlaps of the SIC are interpreted as a map from H/Z( H) into C whose absolute values are the Hermitian `angles' between the lines in the bouquet. We also introduce a regularity condition on bouquets in terms of the angle-map, intended to weaken the equiangularity condition of SICs. At the same time, it allows the incorporation of the R-structure via the abstract automorphism group of H which in turn generalises the Clifford group of SIC theory via its associated Weil representation. As well as several subsidiary definitions and `structural' results, we prove a new `clinometric relation' for the angle-map, determine the structure of the automorphism group and introduce a large class of examples of arithmetic origin, derived from the trace-pairing on quotients of fractional ideals in an arbitrary number field, which we investigate in greater detail.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…