On the Converse of Pr\'ekopa's Theorem and Berndtsson's Theorem
Abstract
Given a continuous function φ defined on a domain ⊂Rm×Rn, we show that if a Pr\'ekopa-type result holds for φ+ for any non-negative convex function on , then φ must be a convex function. Additionally, if the projection of onto Rm is convex, then is also convex. This provides a converse of Pr\'ekopa's theorem from convex analysis. We also establish analogous results for Berndtsson's theorem on the plurisubharmonic variation of Bergman kernels, showing that the plurisubharmonicity of weight functions and the pseudoconvexity of domains are necessary conditions in some sense.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.