On Extended Concentration Inequalities for Fast JL Embeddings of Infinite Sets

Abstract

The Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma allows subsets of a high-dimensional space to be embedded into a lower-dimensional space while approximately preserving all pairwise Euclidean distances. This important result has inspired an extensive literature, with a significant portion dedicated to constructing structured random matrices with fast matrix-vector multiplication algorithms that generate such embeddings for finite point sets. In this paper, we briefly consider fast JL embedding matrices for infinite subsets of Rd. Prior work in this direction such as oymak2018isometric, mendelson2023column has focused on constructing fast JL matrices HD ∈ Rk × d by multiplying structured matrices with RIP(-like) properties H ∈ Rk × d against a random diagonal matrix D ∈ Rd × d. However, utilizing RIP(-like) matrices H in this fashion necessarily has the unfortunate side effect that the resulting embedding dimension k must depend on the ambient dimension d no matter how simple the infinite set is that one aims to embed. Motivated by this, we explore an alternate strategy for removing this d-dependence from k herein: Extending a concentration inequality proven by Ailon and Liberty Ailon2008fast in the hope of later utilizing it in a chaining argument to obtain a near-optimal result for infinite sets. %, and (ii) utilizing a simple secondary Gaussian embedding of an initial fast JL embedding of a given infinite set. Though this strategy ultimately fails to provide the near-optimal embedding dimension we seek, along the way we obtain a stronger-than-sub-exponential extension of the concentration inequality in Ailon2008fast which may be of independent interest.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…