Fσ-ideals, colorings, and representation in Banach spaces

Abstract

In recent works by L. Drewnowski and I. Labuda and J. Mart\'inez et al., non-pathological analytic \( P \)-ideals and non-pathological \( Fσ \)-ideals have been characterized and studied in terms of their representations by a sequence \( (xn)n \) in a Banach space, as \( C((xn)n) \) and \( B((xn)n) \). The ideal \( C((xn)n) \) consists of sets where the series \( Σn ∈ A xn \) is unconditionally convergent, while \( B((xn)n) \) involves weak unconditional convergence. In this paper, we further study these representations and provide effective descriptions of \( B \)- and \( C \)-ideals in the universal spaces \( C([0,1]) \) and \( C(2N) \), addressing a question posed by Borodulin-Nadzieja et al. A key aspect of our study is the role of the space \( c0 \) in these representations. We focus particularly on \( B \)-representations in spaces containing many copies of \( c0 \), such as \( c0 \)-saturated spaces of continuous functions. A central tool in our analysis is the concept of \( c \)-coloring ideals, which arise from homogeneous sets of continuous colorings. These ideals, generated by homogeneous sets of 2-colorings, exhibit a rich combinatorial structure. Among our results, we prove that for \( d ≥ 3 \), the random \( d \)-homogeneous ideal is pathological, we construct hereditarily non-pathological universal \( c \)-coloring ideals, and we show that every \( B \)-ideal represented in \( C(K) \), for \( K \) countable, contains a \( c \)-coloring ideal. Furthermore, by leveraging \( c \)-coloring ideals, we provide examples of \( B \)-ideals that are not \( B \)-representable in \( c0 \). These findings highlight the interplay between combinatorial properties of ideals and their representations in Banach spaces.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…