Regularity of solutions for fully fractional parabolic equations

Abstract

In this paper, we study the fully fractional heat equation involving the master operator: (∂t -)s u(x,t) = f(x,t)\ \ in\ Rn×R , where s∈(0,1) and f(x,t) ≥ 0. First we derive H\"older and Schauder estimates for nonnegative solutions of this equation. Due to the nonlocality of the master operator, existing results (cf. ST) rely on global bounds of the solutions u to control their higher local norms. However, such results are inadequate for blow-up and rescaling analysis aimed at obtaining a priori estimates for solutions to nonlocal equations on unbounded domains, as the global norms of the rescaled functions may diverge. This limitation raises to a natural and challenging question: Can local bounds of solutions replace global bounds to control their higher local norms? Here, we provide an affirmative answer to this question for nonnegative solutions. To achieve this, we introduced several new ideas and novel techniques. One of the key innovations is to use a directional perturbation average to derive an important estimate for the fully fractional heat kernel, as stated in Lemma key0. We believe this estimate, along with other new techniques introduced here, will serve as powerful tools in regularity estimates for a wide range of nonlocal equations. Building on this breakthrough, we employ the blow-up and rescaling arguments to establish a priori estimates for solutions to a broader class of nonlocal equations in unbounded domains, such as (∂t -)s u(x,t) = b(x,t) |∇x u (x,t)|q + f(x, u(x,t))\ \ in\ \ Rn×R. Under appropriate conditions, we prove that all nonnegative solutions, along with their spatial gradients, are uniformly bounded.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…