Weak Baumgartner axioms and universal spaces
Abstract
If X is a topological space and is a cardinal then BA (X) is the statement that for each pair A, B ⊂eq X of -dense subsets there is an autohomeomorphism h:X X mapping A to B. In particular BA_1 ( R) is equivalent the celebrated Baumgartner axiom on isomorphism types of 1-dense linear orders. In this paper we consider two natural weakenings of BA (X) which we call BA- (X) and U (X) for arbitrary perfect Polish spaces X. We show that the first of these, though properly weaker, entails many of the more striking consequences of BA (X) while the second does not. Nevertheless the second is still independent of ZFC and we show in particular that it fails in the Cohen and random models. This motivates several new classes of pairs of spaces which are ``very far from being homeomorphic" which we call ``avoiding", ``strongly avoiding", and ``totally avoiding". The paper concludes by studying these classes, particularly in the context of forcing theory, in an attempt to gauge how different weak Baumgartner axioms may be separated.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.