Two generalisations of sharp k-transitivity
Abstract
An action U G of a group G on a set U is sharply k-transitive if, for any two k-tuples a, b ∈ Uk of distinct elements, there is a unique g ∈ G with a · g = b. We consider two generalisations of this. Firstly, given Θ≤ Sk, we define a sharply Θ-transitive action U G to be a k-set-transitive action where the restricted action on each k-set of its setwise-stabiliser is isomorphic to the permutation action k Θ. An action is sharply Sk-transitive iff it is sharply k-transitive. We characterise for which Θ≤ Sk there is a sharply Θ-transitive action on an infinite set, and show that if such an action exists, then the acting group G can be taken to be a finitely generated non-abelian virtually free group. As a consequence, we obtain for k = 2, 3 the first examples of non-split finitely-presented groups admitting sharply k-transitive actions on an infinite set, answering a question of André and Tent, and we obtain a strengthening of the well-known result of Tits that no group admits a sharply k-transitive action on an infinite set for k ≥ 4. Secondly, we generalise sharp k-transitivity to relational structures. Given an action M G of a group G on a relational structure M, we say that the action is sharply k-homogeneous if, for any two k-tuples a, b of distinct elements of M where a b is an isomorphism, there is a unique g ∈ G with a · g = b. We show that, for 1 ≤ k ≤ 3, a wide range of countable ultrahomogeneous structures admit sharply k-homogeneous actions by finitely generated non-abelian virtually free groups, answering a question of Cameron from 1990.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.