On the definition of "almost LUR (ALUR)" notion
Abstract
The notion of almost LUR (ALUR) point is introduced in the paper [P. Bandyopadhyay et al., Some generalizations of locally uniform rotundity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 252, 906-916 (2000)], where one says that the point x of the unit sphere SX of a Banach space is an almost LUR (ALUR) point of BX if for any sequences \xn\⊂eq BX and \xm\⊂eq BX, the condition mnxm(xn+x2)=1 implies n xn-x =0, without mentioning what is meant by mnγm,n=γ for γ, γm,n∈R; X is ALUR if X is almost LUR at any x∈ SX. Of course, the natural definition for this iterated limit would be that for each m sufficiently large there exists μm:=n→∞γm,n∈R and γ =m→∞μm. However, as seen in some proofs where mn appears, this interpretation is not confirmed. In this paper we examine several works in which almost LUR is mentioned and, especially, the proofs of those results in which the above definition of "almost LUR" point (or space) is invoked. Moreover, we analyze similar problems related to the notion CWALUR which extend ALUR. Furthermore, we mention several gaps in the proofs of some results. Finally, we propose the change of mn by mn in the definitions of several types of ALUR points; moreover, we provide the complete proofs of two results from the literature in which mn were used effectively, using mn instead.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.