Breaking the Balance: Asymmetric Negative Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election
Abstract
While voters from opposing parties have traditionally exhibited symmetric levels of hostility toward out-party candidates, our analysis of the 2016 and 2020 Nationscape data reveals a notable departure from this pattern. In 2016, negative voting was relatively balanced, with similar levels of hostility directed at Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. However, by 2020, asymmetric negative voting had emerged. As an incumbent seeking re-election amid a rapidly declining economy, the COVID-19 pandemic, and widespread uncertainty, Trump faced heightened negative perceptions fueled by dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy, race relations, the pandemic, and his leadership style. These factors galvanized younger, educated Democrats and Independents to vote against him in unprecedented numbers. In contrast, Republicans expressed less animosity toward Biden in 2020 than they had toward Clinton in 2016. This shift disrupted the balance in the typical pattern of symmetric negative voting.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.